Dangerous Liaisons
. A reason for the popular revolts in the Arab world that estn causing each stagnant impunity of dictators in power and that meant their governments to excessive pomp travs, put back on the table well-known reality of the politicians and propagandistic use of the architecture. The current circumstances become an uncomfortable situation for many Western architects, who displayed their magnificent projects for these dictators in a rhetorical mess, wow power leveling, on edge, progress and democracy.
The architects have not wasted the least occasion to serve these regmenes, amparndose interested in the legitimacy that the West has been giving them as they were useful to maintain the structure politics and economic way of a status quo global background which is increasingly manifest more cloudy. They have done so without expressing any ideological adhesin, but also without question,, everquest 2 platinum, relegating any possibility of tico dilemma, as their buildings would not be safe objects, but elements that will continue enacting and reinforcing the power of these tyrants.
Getting through to the art books
It is counterproductive to limit the criticism of those productions to strictly formal or aesthetic value, although it can be debated whether any of them go into the, darkfall online gold, annals of history. But s is needed reflection on the attitude led by the oligarchy of architecture: the facts on Libya to mind the proposed luxury resort and all ecological designed by Norman Foster in 2007, and presented as evidence of the reformist intentions of Saif-al-Islam Gadhafi, the second son of the dictator.
ABC
Conflict in Tripoli Museum, Metropolitan Workshop
An attitude that today is increasing in people like Bjarke Ingels, spokesman last excellences of western star architect to serve a dictator with statements like: we signed in Kazajistny the client said: "We want to move the building 800 meters to make it more close to the president's palace. " Can not find this kind of debate audience when you work in other countries too democrticos. The frivolity of evil is the same obliteracin Ingels of truth put forward by other significant names such as Foster and Jacques Herzog, who have insisted on dnding fraudulent projects seriously vacuous and expiry date questionable immediate political context and the recurring excuse that the buildings potenciarn feelings of freedom and democracy are not monuments to the leader, but for the people, that is an attitude more politically constructed to support boycotts legtima against those countries.
These authors have all consideracin transvestite consecucin policy in the shortest length of the road for the entrenchment of their own personal ambitions. But we understand that these purchases of fictions democrticas shaped building is a reflection of a civilization in which trash the democratic principles so that lies and reckless opinions like these that are known architects protected As citizens of free places, support the decisions of dictators, volvindose accomplices.
Comments are closed.